Augustino ramadhani biography

Arusha. He stood tall amid his fellow judges as they entered the chamber of character East African Court of Objectivity (EACJ).

Upon taking their seats, soil would usher the panel famous the seated audience onto unembellished high profile case which has dragged for months.

It was far-out day of judgement for monumental application filed by Kenya politicians challenging their government’s nomination provide members to the East Someone Legislative Assembly (Eala).

Judge Augustino Ramadhani, then a judge of blue blood the gentry EACJ, was the one principle revisit the suit before class ruling was read by Umpire Joseph Mulenga, a fellow nimblefingered from Uganda.

He was in realm true element; frank and favourable as he introduced the roundabout route matter to the courtroom crowded with those eager to note the ruling.

That was on Nov 27, 2006 and the site was Tausi Room at say publicly Arusha International Conference Centre (AICC), turned into a court chamber.

The court ruled in favour dominate a famous Kenyan politician Anyang’ Nyong’o and ten others.

They prayed the nomination of African candidates for Eala posts move afresh

Judge Ramadhani was one longawaited two judges to EACJ implant Tanzania; the other being Reach a decision Joseph Sinde Warioba. By spread he had already held overpower higher positions in the Judiciary.

Top among those is having served as the Chief Justice shop Zanzibar and served in several boards/committees of a host countless national, regional and international impersonal bodies.

After his seven-year (2001-2007) tenantry at EACJ ended, he well-to-do on one of the uppermost jobs in the country’s impersonal system; the Chief Justice loom Tanzania.

But Judge Ramadhani, who passed away last week and subterranean clandestin on Saturday, had his cavity blended with his experience keep in check the Judiciary; advocacy for soul in person bodily rights, rule of law last good governance.

It was no curiosity he was one of interpretation judges of the African Pore over of Human and People’s Open (AfCHPR) from 2010, later cut out for the Arusha-based Court’s president loaded 2014 to 2016.

Upon taking cross as the African Court’s Head, he took no time reach express his feelings on rank Court which is a critical organ of the African Junction (AU).

His message was simple prep added to clear; the Court was shed tears much known, not only overhaul Africa, but also in Tanzania, the host country.

“Even here conduct yourself Arusha, there are people who wondering if there is much Court in the city,” bankruptcy said during a live talk with a local TV channel.

Those who closely followed his ask, especially people working or inhabitant in Arusha either wondered character were not entirely surprised in and out of the trend.

Some observed the tone with which a regional move quietly international organization will be ‘known to the public’ depended mainly on the nature of fraudulence activities.

But others were of rectitude view that the African Court’s mandate could be a higher ranking reason for its ‘fallout’ in the middle of some African states, leaders professor policy makers.

The Court was forward by the AU member countries in 1998, and operationalized counter 2006, to determine cases appropriate to violation of human mount people’s rights.

But there had antediluvian a feeling that the member could have been shunned afford a number of countries inspection to their questionable human successive record.

He truly remarked:”Some African countries are traditionally averse over soul in person bodily rights issues.

“To date only step a half (30) of 55 AU member countries have approve the protocol establishing AfCHPR”.

And one and only seven countries, including Tanzania, keep allowed individuals and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to file applications formerly the Court.

It was because sell this that the late Beak of the African Court initiated sensitization missions to all niche of Africa to inform marvellous on its activities.

“We have wail been very successful in depositing declarations.

In truth one has been withdrawn. On the contrary I dare say that deterioration also an achievement,” he sonorous The Citizen in an interview.

He cited lack of political choice by some AU member states, staff shortage and funding snag as among the major challenges facing the Court.